Tuesday, 21 April 2009

Fight for the Right to Die!

"If I cannot give consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?"

- The Late Sue Rodriguez, Canada

To commit the suicide is the chicken way out? Discrimination against person! To commit the suicide is to send oneself to hell? Ignorance due to religion!

Before you raise any objection, read the quote on the top and please answer the questions.

Right now in most countries in the world assisted suicide is illegal. Assisted suicide means to commit the suicide with the help of a third person. Well, that third person is doomed to jail. And still in some countries even suicide by oneself is unlawful. Really, "whose body is this"? Gladly, The federal government of the United States decriminalised attempted suicide in 1972.

My buddy Lung states that "Medical science is pseudoscience"; and its goal is to keep producing zombies, such as those vegatables lying in beds with only breath but no thoughts. By now we have to examine to definition of living. You can very well say, "OK. As long as the guy's heart beats, that's great." But would you please replace "the guy's" with "my" and re-think about it? What did you feel when you had a sleep paralysis, in which you felt your neck hurt but couldn't turn your body? That might be what those vegies are feeling every single second! By what name you are thinking you are saving those people? By what course you forbid them to die?

One thing I want to say to all alleged medical professionals: fuck you all and God damn you all to Hell! You are the real serial killers. You guys make humans even inferior than animals. Even a horse could be euthanised but not a human like you and me.

Some people aruge that "vulnerable" individuals may be coerced into assisted suicide to ease the financial burden of caring for them. However, this is discrimination. If you were in their shoes, you would rather notice the financial burden is a fact instead of your imaginary problem due to weak psyche.

Prohibition of suicide is unconstitutional and agaisnt human rights. (More details need here.)

By the perspective of civilisation, we see humans are able to control more and more aspects of their lives; by that mean, in the end we should be able to determinte our final fate: death, including its time and circumstance.

We humans have come a long way through our civilisation. Along that way, our fathers fought for the abolishment of slavery, for the equal social status of women, for the freedom of African Americans, etc. Today, we need to fight for the right to die!

When the beating of your heart echos the beating of the drums, there's a life about to start when tomorrow comes!

- Do You Hear the People Sing?, Les Misérables

Last but not least, we do not advocate suicide on a general mean. Rather, we advocate the allowance and the assistance of a person who him or herself wants to die.

醫學就是偽科學

By Lung

這篇文章,我將通過電腦科學與醫學作對照,論述醫學就是撤撤底底的偽科學。

電腦中,說到底只有1和0兩個數位。醫學(生命科學)說到底也只有A,T和C,G兩種堿基對。從1和0,人們發明了計算機高階語言,這就好比細胞。使用高階語言,可以變成程式單元(a concept far inherited from procedural programming),若干個程式單元,就組成了一個完整的程式。醫學也是這樣,細胞(高階語言)組成器官(程式單元),器官組成人(完整的程式)。

電腦高階語言是由機器語言(0和1)發展來的。高階語言通過組譯器,轉換為機器語言然後運行。但是醫學中,人類到現在完全不知道A,T和C,G的不同排列意味著什麼意思,醫學也就研究研究細胞最多了。人病了,很多時候說到底就是全部或局部細胞中的堿基對序列發生改變,那麼醫學去研究細胞是完全治不好病的。

得了病,你去醫院看,最後好了,你可別以為是醫學把你治好了,而是你自己的免疫系統。這是電腦科學中不常用的,程式的自我修復功能(以後可以研究一下,運用到電腦中)。

所以說,現在的醫學(生命科學之實用延伸)就是偽科學,事實也證明如此,自身無法修復的疾病,醫學也束手無策。Look at a medicine book and tell me how many diseases could be really "uprooted" insteaded of "suppressed".

哪一天人類能夠系統的研究A,G,C,T,那麼真正的醫學才算創立!

Friday, 17 April 2009

Chi-kung? Science?

When I picked up the book Physics of the Impossible(Michio Kaku, 2009), subconciously I started to interconnect the mystical nature of "impossible" scientific phenomena with also mystical Chinese Chi-kung. The future of physics might coincide with Chi-kung, as those two have a sufficient number of similarites both deemed impossibled at the present.

I can stick a list of correspondence here:
Force shield - Tough Chi-kung
Anti-gravity - Light Chi-kung

But if Chi-kung is really this similar to science, why was it rarely proposed formally in academic groud? I think there're mainly two reasons. First is the lack of western concern. They don't know orientals well while their achievements so far enable them to believe they're sufficient on their ideas own. The second is the lack of quality of Chinese scientists. We don't really rely on alleged scholars in mainland China, some of whom are actually political opportunitists. Even real Chinese scientists in Chinese Academy of Science (currently based in Province of Taiwan, Republic of China) don't have sufficient attention or fund on this issue.

Tuesday, 7 April 2009

Anti-censorship Techniques

Science has to be used for justice.
- Satomi, Ultra Squad, Ultra 7

The only technique to bypass Internet censorship so far is to utilise proxies. Those proxies that could be used to this purpose fall into the following three categories:
  1. Web proxies
  2. Server-side proxies
  3. Client-side proxy programs
Web Proxies
  • Some paid services
  • Most with advertisements
  • Easily to be censored